From 7c55fa4dc95767efb1cb4c2b69872df5903ee8ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Kuzminsky Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2025 15:17:27 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] add comment bd8d26478108fde4e1a9f32507957e5f on issue 08f0d7ee7842c439382816d21ec1dea2 --- .../description | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 08f0d7ee7842c439382816d21ec1dea2/comments/bd8d26478108fde4e1a9f32507957e5f/description diff --git a/08f0d7ee7842c439382816d21ec1dea2/comments/bd8d26478108fde4e1a9f32507957e5f/description b/08f0d7ee7842c439382816d21ec1dea2/comments/bd8d26478108fde4e1a9f32507957e5f/description new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a1b03ce --- /dev/null +++ b/08f0d7ee7842c439382816d21ec1dea2/comments/bd8d26478108fde4e1a9f32507957e5f/description @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +I'm liking the idea of a per-issue key/value store. + +I think keys and values are both strings, with possible further +parsing/interpretation for some keys? + +For the application in this issue we'd teach ent to create a "finished" +key, maybe when setting the state to Done, with a value of an +ISO8601-style datetime stamp (e.g. "2025-07-12T15:08:58-06:00"). + +There would be a documented spec of reserved keys and their special +meanings and handling. + +Full user access via CLI, maybe something like `ent get VARIABLE` and +`ent set VARIABLE VALUE`? Or `ent variable [NAME[=VALUE]]`? + +Or maybe merge this with the tags somehow? Would that be simpler, +or more complicated (for the user)?